A key point is that Supply Siders propose to cut the tax rate, that is, the proportion of each dollar of income taken by taxes. That's different from cutting tax revenue. The Supply Siders have hoped that, by cutting the tax rate, they could increase production by so much that tax revenues would hold steady, or even increase. Let's see if we can visualize this in one of our AS/AD diagrams:
Now the tax rate is cut to t2/p. This stimulates investment, increasing productivity and shifting the LAS rightward to LAS2. We assume that aggregate demand also shifts to AD2, so that the price level is steady at p. (This shift in Aggregate Demand could partly be a result of the tax multiplier impact of the tax cut itself. If that's not enough, we suppose that the Federal Reserve system "accommodates" the shift in Aggregate Supply by increasing the money supply). We have a new equilibrium with price level p and real GDP at Y2. The tax take is the sum of the area shaded like this: and the area shaded like this:
.
How are we doing? There have been both an increase and a decrease in tax revenues. Tax revenues on Y1 of real GDP have decreased by the rectangle shaded like this: ; but they have increased by the tax on the increased production the area shaded like this:
. If the second area is greater than the first, then tax revenues will actually have increased.
Here is the conclusion: it is logically possible, in the AS/AD model, for a tax cut to increase, rather than decreasing, total tax revenues. For the Supply Siders, this is more than a possibility -- it is a promise. They propose to increase tax revenues by cutting tax rates.
But will it really work?
Copyright