We can now define a "public good" in general. Following the example of the lighthouse, modern economics defines a "public good" as a good that shares the two key characteristics of the lighthouse:
Let us consider one other fairly clear example of a public good. The example is television and radio broadcasting without commercials. No-commercial broadcasting is a different service than broadasting with commercials, and we are concerned here only with no-commercial broadcasting. Broadcasting with commercials is a substitute for broadcasting without commercials, but not a perfect substitute. Does no-commercial broadcasting fit the definition of a public good?
It does. First, it is virtually impossible to charge those who benefit from the broadcast. Anyone with a radio or a TV can tune in and benefit without paying. Second, the marginal cost of the additional listener or TV-watcher is zero. So broadcasting without commercials fits both parts of the definition, and is a public good.
Economic theory tells us that a public good will not be provided by profit-oriented private suppliers, and sure enough, no-commercial radio and TV are mostly public radio and TV. There are a few radio and TV stations supported by charitable contributions -- mostly devoted to religious programming. But no-commercial broadcasting fits the theory of public goods in this way as well: profit oriented business doesn't supply no-commercial broadcasting.

Copyright