Not fair, but ...
It's true that the "theory of supply and demand" is a central part of economics. It is widely applicable, and also is a model of the way economists try to think most problems through, even when the theory of supply and demand is not applicable.
Adam Smith had argued that each good or service has a "natural price." If the price (of beer, for example), were above the natural price, then more resources would be attracted into the trade (brewing, in the example), and the price would return to its "natural" level. Conversely if the price began below its "natural" level.
Unlike the "natural price," a long-run theory only, the theory of supply and demand applies in the short run as well as the long.
The buyers are the "demand side" of the market.
Sellers are the "supply side" of the market.
Alfred Marshall compared the supply and demand sides to the two blades of scissors -- one won't cut. You have to have both.
Similarly, it is not enough that the suppliers possess the good or (the capacity to perform) the service. Supply also means willingness to sell.
The convention in economics is to use the word "demand" to mean the demand relationship and "quantity demanded" for the specific quantity that people are willing to purchase, when there could be confusion.
| price, cents/gal. |
Quantity demanded, millions of gals. |
|---|---|
| 50 | 4899.27 |
| 60 | 4355.67 |
| 70 | 3812.07 |
| 80 | 3268.47 |
| 90 | 2724.87 |
| 100 | 2181.27 |
| 110 | 1637.67 |
| 120 | 1094.07 |
At a higher price, the quantity demanded will be less, ceteris paribus.
2. The demand relationship can be represented, and approximated, by
3. Mathematically, the demand schedule and diagram we have just seen can also be expressed as
Q = 7617.27 - 54.36*P
The actual prices and quantities demanded for the different years are also shown, so you can see about how good an approximation it is.
Here is the supply schedule corresponding to the beer demand given before.
| price, cents/gal. |
Quantity supplied, millions of gals. |
|---|---|
| 50 | 0 |
| 60 | 0 |
| 70 | 0 |
| 80 | 1304.4 |
| 90 | 2894 |
| 100 | 4483.6 |
| 110 | 6073 |
| 120 | 7662.8 |
Here is the supply schedule corresponding to the beer demand given before.
| price, cents/gal. |
Quantity supplied, millions of gals. |
|---|---|
| 50 | 0 |
| 60 | 0 |
| 70 | 0 |
| 80 | 1304.4 |
| 90 | 2894 |
| 100 | 4483.6 |
| 110 | 6073 |
| 120 | 7662.8 |
The long-run, short-run distinction is less important for demand, and we will not go into that in this introductory course.
Market "equilibrium" exists when the price is high enough so that the quantity supplied just equals the quantity demanded. In a diagram, the "equilibrium" price is the price at which the demand and supply curves cross. The corresponding quantity is the quantity that would be traded in a market equilibrium.
Let's see what that looks like in the market for beer.
Put another way, it is the price toward which competition pushes the price. At equilibrium, there is no competition either to buy or to sell, because everyone can buy or sell however much they may wish, at the going price. But whenever the market is away from equilibrium, competition will arise and tend to force it back.
Competition eliminates itself, by forcing the market into an equilibrium in which there is no need to compete. (This is a very different concept of competition than the biological "struggle for survival!)
Remember that economists think of "a change in demand" as a shift of an entire demand curve. Likewise supply.
By the way, always think of a shift in supply as "leftward" or "rightward," not "up" or "down." Thinking in terms of "up" and "down" will cause confusion!
2. A change in the population.
3. Changes in the prices of other goods.
4. Changes in consumer tastes.
2. A change in technology.
3. Changes in natural conditions.
We will analyze an increase in the demand for food:
This example shows a decrease in the supply of food.
The figure shows the impact of an excise tax. From the point of view of sellers, the tax decreases demand from D to D'; the vertical distance between the two curves is the tax. The price paid to the seller falls, but not as much as the tax, because the cutback in production moves downward along the supply curve.
The figure shows the subsidy shifting the supply curve to the right, from S1 to S2. The vertical distance is the amount of the subsidy: one dollar per bushel. Demand is D, as usual. With supply S1 -- before the subsidy is given -- the market equilibrium price is p1 and the equilibrium production is Q1. With supply S2 -- when the subsidy is given -- the market equilibrium price is p2 and the equilibrium production is Q2.