Here is the story that goes with the figure. At the beginning of the story, Aggregate Supply is SAS1 from a short run point of view and LAS1 from a long run point of view. Production is near the intersection of SAS1 and LAS1. However, a series of unexpected disasters reduces aggregate demand and production to Y1 one year and further to Y2 in the second year. Perhaps these disasters are like the ones that set off the Great Depression in the 1930's -- a collapse in autonomous consumption followed by further collapses of the banking system, the money supply, and investment. Or perhaps they are like the disasters that struck European economies in the 1970's and set off their periods of high unemployment that have continued to this day; or, yet again, like the disasters that have struck the Asian industrializing economies in 1997. Anyway, they are historically unique and so unexpected, that is: they are surprises, so they cause a movement down the SAS1 curve to the points indicated by Y1 and Y2.
When the LAS changes in this way in response to short-run changes and changes in Aggregate Demand, we say that it is "path dependent."
As we have seen, if the NAIRGDP is path dependent, that could reconcile the evidence that (on the one hand) people's expectations are unbiased and (on the other hand) production is highly permanent. And we have some independent evidence that, in fact, supply decisions are path dependent.
Where does that leave us with respect to Policy Ineffectiveness?
Copyright